LIE'S - Further Information - Page 3
LIE NO 20: “33 Mr Webb also referred to recent incidents where defects had not been reported
by other Drivers but did not provide examples”.
You only have to read the hearing minutes to see what a BLATANT LIAR this man is, I still have every defect sheet and every report.
LIE NO 16: “He suggested that if such faults are so prevalent then he should not have to report
such problems”.
LIE NO 17: “Mr Webb stated on numerous occasions that he had made similar false reports previously but had never been disciplined”.
LIE NO 24: “indicated that he had previously fabricated other incidents”.
LIE NO 28: “40.4 having considered Mr Webb's admission that he had fabricated incidents before and reported them without disciplinary sanction”.
LIE NO 29: “following consideration of further documentation”,
LIE NO 30: "And that he would do it again".
I never had to fabricate any other incidents, I had used scenario statements in the past to highlight the possible outcome of their continual ignorance, what I attempted to show him in my hearing was classed as previous and he ignored it until he found something he thought would help his cause, then previous was absolutely fine.
Where he ever came up with the idea that I said I would do it again is beyond me, his LIE'S are here for the whole world to see, I hope they finally bring him to justice and if they do, the implications are vast for everyone!
by other Drivers but did not provide examples”.
You only have to read the hearing minutes to see what a BLATANT LIAR this man is, I still have every defect sheet and every report.
LIE NO 16: “He suggested that if such faults are so prevalent then he should not have to report
such problems”.
LIE NO 17: “Mr Webb stated on numerous occasions that he had made similar false reports previously but had never been disciplined”.
LIE NO 24: “indicated that he had previously fabricated other incidents”.
LIE NO 28: “40.4 having considered Mr Webb's admission that he had fabricated incidents before and reported them without disciplinary sanction”.
LIE NO 29: “following consideration of further documentation”,
LIE NO 30: "And that he would do it again".
I never had to fabricate any other incidents, I had used scenario statements in the past to highlight the possible outcome of their continual ignorance, what I attempted to show him in my hearing was classed as previous and he ignored it until he found something he thought would help his cause, then previous was absolutely fine.
Where he ever came up with the idea that I said I would do it again is beyond me, his LIE'S are here for the whole world to see, I hope they finally bring him to justice and if they do, the implications are vast for everyone!